N1.35bn corruption case: Supreme Court orders continuation of ex-Gov. Lamido, son’s trial

The Supreme Court has ordered the continuation of the trial of former governor of Jigawa state, Alhaji Sule Lamido and his two sons, Mustapha and Aminu Lamido in the 1.35 billion naira corruption charges brought against them by the EFCC.

Justice Abubakar Umar in a unanimous decision of 5-man panel of Justices held that the appeal by the EFCC against the Court of Appeal verdict was meritorious and sustained.

The judgment of the Court of Appeal in July 2023 which set the former governor free was voided and set aside by the apex court.

The apex court ordered that Lamido and his two sons should go back to the Federal High Court and defend themselves from the EFCC allegations.

It ordered that the charges against the defendants be resuscitated by EFCC for the Lamidos to enter their defense in the corruption charges.

Lamido, his sons, Aminu Wada Abubakar, and their companies Bamaina Holdings Limited and Speeds International Limited were arraigned before Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

They were arraigned on a 37-count amended charge, including money laundering and abuse of office.

The EFCC alleged that Lamido, who governed Jigawa from 2007 to 2015 laundered 1.35 billion naira in kickbacks from contractors handling state government projects.

At the completion of the EFCC case, Lamido and other defendants filed a no case submission on the ground that no prima facie case was established against them.

The Federal High Court in a ruling dismissed the no case submission and held that sufficient evidence had been supplied by EFCC that required them to enter defense.

The former governor took the case to the Court of Appeal which in July 2023 disagreed with the Federal High Court and dismissed the charges against the defendants.

Not satisfied with the Court of Appeal’s decision, the EFCC filed an appeal at the apex court praying it to uphold the ruling of the Federal High Court and remit the matter to the court for continuation of trial.

EFCC submitted that the Court of Appeal erred in law by discharging the defendants despite the avalanches of evidence establishing a prima facie case against the former governor and his sons.